An absorbing analysis of the social discontentment that plagues South Korea’s economic success.
South Korea is a wealthy and technologically advanced country, but its citizens are anxious, stressed, and headed toward demographic collapse, according to Gonzalez and Lee’s book-length study.
Gonzalez, an American educator who’s taught high school in South Korea, and Lee, a South Korean financial analyst and professor, have conducted a wide-ranging survey of the titular country’s manifest virtues and nagging problems. On the plus side, they note, is a culture that values hard work, competitiveness, self-sacrifice, and efficiency; society demands instant solutions to every problem and employs all manner of time-saving gadgetry, from restaurant call buttons that instantly summon waiters to self-service medical kiosks. The authors have found much unhappiness beneath the bustle, however. Several chapters discuss South Korea’s preoccupation with education: In the struggle to score well on the all-important exams that govern admission to elite universities, parents supplement their kids’ regular schooling with expensive “cram schools” and private tutoring, both of which strain family finances and leave students exhausted from the pressure. (An unexpected consequence, the authors note, is degree inflation: 69% of young Koreans have postsecondary degrees, which devalues educational credentials in the job market.) The authors also spotlight high rates of fatal accidents—capsized ferries, building collapses, deadly fires, workplace mishaps—stemming from lax safety regulations, corner-cutting, and corruption. They investigate what they see as a widespread soul-sickness that manifests in the corrosion of traditional norms and the younger generation’s sense of being stuck in a materialistic rat race (as in the Netflix series Squid Game, which depicts a South Korean game show in which players risk sudden death for money). The book also confronts a truly existential risk for the country in the form of extremely low fertility rates.
The authors construct their panorama of South Korea’s fortunes by combining illuminating statistics and graphs with an intimate, deeply observed account of cultural aspects, from the intense popularity of K-pop and plastic surgery to the warm tradition of sharing food with strangers. (Their vignette of a South Korean dinner paints a vibrant portrait of Confucian values in everyday life: “Everyone digs in with zest, enjoying every bite while being careful not to appear too eager or selfish or eat faster or larger quantities than the rest of the group.”) The lucid, workmanlike prose adds psychological resonance to the sociology (“Young Koreans are devastated by and frustrated with the economy’s inability to create sufficient, well-paying permanent jobs to accommodate the number of university graduates”), and it’s supplemented by revealing interviews: “Employment is… It’s like a big wall and trauma for me,” observes one young job seeker. “As soon as I graduated, I felt like an unnecessary [piece of] garbage in society, and no matter how hard I tried, I couldn’t even get an interview.” Readers interested in South Korea’s paradoxical tensions will find a wealth of insights, but the authors offer a larger lesson about the trajectory of modernity that could apply to many other countries that, having dedicated themselves to economic growth and material abundance, find themselves mired in a frustrating spiritual malaise.
An absorbing analysis of the social discontentment that plagues South Korea’s economic success.Pub Date: March 24, 2024
ISBN: 9781737651321
Page Count: 274
Publisher: Self
Review Posted Online: May 23, 2024
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
BOOK REVIEW
A short, smart analysis of perhaps the most famous passage in American history reveals its potency and unfulfilled promise.
Words that made a nation.
Isaacson is known for expansive biographies of great thinkers (and Elon Musk), but here he pens a succinct, stimulating commentary on the Founding Fathers’ ode to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” His close reading of the Declaration of Independence’s second sentence, published to mark the 250th anniversary of the document’s adoption, doesn’t downplay its “moral contradiction.” Thomas Jefferson enslaved hundreds of people yet called slavery “a cruel war against human nature” in his first draft of the Declaration. All but 15 of the document’s 56 signers owned enslaved people. While the sentence in question asserted “all men are created equal” and possess “unalienable rights,” the Founders “consciously and intentionally” excluded women, Native Americans, and enslaved people. And yet the sentence is powerful, Isaacson writes, because it names a young nation’s “aspirations.” He mounts a solid defense of what ought to be shared goals, among them economic fairness, “moral compassion,” and a willingness to compromise. “Democracy depends on this,” he writes. Isaacson is excellent when explaining how Enlightenment intellectuals abroad influenced the founders. Benjamin Franklin, one of the Declaration’s “five-person drafting committee,” stayed in David Hume’s home for a month in the early 1770s, “discussing ideas of natural rights” with the Scottish philosopher. Also strong is Isaacson’s discussion of the “edits and tweaks” made to Jefferson’s draft. As recommended by Franklin and others, the changes were substantial, leaving Jefferson “distraught.” Franklin, who emerges as the book’s hero, helped establish municipal services, founded a library, and encouraged religious diversity—the kind of civic-mindedness that we could use more of today, Isaacson reminds us.
A short, smart analysis of perhaps the most famous passage in American history reveals its potency and unfulfilled promise.Pub Date: Nov. 18, 2025
ISBN: 9781982181314
Page Count: 80
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Review Posted Online: Aug. 29, 2025
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 1, 2025
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
SEEN & HEARD
For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.
Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979
ISBN: 0061965588
Page Count: 772
Publisher: Harper & Row
Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
