Next book

THE ATHEIST MUSLIM

A JOURNEY FROM RELIGION TO REASON

Rare and intriguing arguments in the debate over Islam.

Leaving Islam and showing others the way out.

Rizvi was raised and educated in such thoroughly Muslim nations as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan before making his home in Canada. Despite a religious upbringing, the author grew skeptical of the tenets of Islam at an early age and eventually opted for atheism. In a multifaceted work, Rizvi attempts to convince others that a rational view of Islam as a culture without need for a religion will allow it to join the modern world. The author begins by discussing the violence, inequality, and lack of freedom he witnessed in the Muslim world, and he reminds his readers that these aspects of Islamic society are not simply cultural outcroppings, but are tied directly to the Muslim religion. “The Abrahamic religions, he writes, “are inherently political” and, as such, will always spill outside of the framework of faith and into public life. Rizvi is especially distressed by Western liberals who defend the most questionable aspects of Islam because they see it as a minority religion in danger of subjugation. In so doing, they unwittingly bolster hard-line Islamists elsewhere who trample on the rights of their own people. “In Pakistan,” he notes, “there are blasphemy laws to force us into silence. Here, there are accusations of Islamophobia to shame us into it.” The author’s own route away from the excesses of his religion was to leave it entirely. He found in atheism an intellectually satisfying answer, and he goes to great lengths to defend it. However, realizing that there are indeed cultural aspects of any religion worth preserving, he points Muslims toward a rational, modernist view of their faith. Pointing out that many Jews and Christians retain their cultural heritage without a belief in God, he urges Muslims to secularize their culture and leave behind the theistic aspects of Islam, which, he believes, have been a grave source of evil for centuries.

Rare and intriguing arguments in the debate over Islam.

Pub Date: Nov. 22, 2016

ISBN: 978-1-250-09444-5

Page Count: 256

Publisher: St. Martin's

Review Posted Online: Sept. 21, 2016

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 1, 2016

Next book

AN INDIGENOUS PEOPLES' HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

A Churchill-ian view of native history—Ward, that is, not Winston—its facts filtered through a dense screen of ideology.

Custer died for your sins. And so, this book would seem to suggest, did every other native victim of colonialism.

Inducing guilt in non-native readers would seem to be the guiding idea behind Dunbar-Ortiz’s (Emerita, Ethnic Studies/California State Univ., Hayward; Blood on the Border: A Memoir of the Contra War, 2005, etc.) survey, which is hardly a new strategy. Indeed, the author says little that hasn’t been said before, but she packs a trove of ideological assumptions into nearly every page. For one thing, while “Indian” isn’t bad, since “[i]ndigenous individuals and peoples in North America on the whole do not consider ‘Indian’ a slur,” “American” is due to the fact that it’s “blatantly imperialistic.” Just so, indigenous peoples were overwhelmed by a “colonialist settler-state” (the very language broadly applied to Israelis vis-à-vis the Palestinians today) and then “displaced to fragmented reservations and economically decimated”—after, that is, having been forced to live in “concentration camps.” Were he around today, Vine Deloria Jr., the always-indignant champion of bias-puncturing in defense of native history, would disavow such tidily packaged, ready-made, reflexive language. As it is, the readers who are likely to come to this book—undergraduates, mostly, in survey courses—probably won’t question Dunbar-Ortiz’s inaccurate assertion that the military phrase “in country” derives from the military phrase “Indian country” or her insistence that all Spanish people in the New World were “gold-obsessed.” Furthermore, most readers won’t likely know that some Ancestral Pueblo (for whom Dunbar-Ortiz uses the long-abandoned term “Anasazi”) sites show evidence of cannibalism and torture, which in turn points to the inconvenient fact that North America wasn’t entirely an Eden before the arrival of Europe.

A Churchill-ian view of native history—Ward, that is, not Winston—its facts filtered through a dense screen of ideology.

Pub Date: Sept. 16, 2014

ISBN: 978-0-8070-0040-3

Page Count: 296

Publisher: Beacon Press

Review Posted Online: Aug. 17, 2014

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2014

Next book

GOOD ECONOMICS FOR HARD TIMES

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

“Quality of life means more than just consumption”: Two MIT economists urge that a smarter, more politically aware economics be brought to bear on social issues.

It’s no secret, write Banerjee and Duflo (co-authors: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way To Fight Global Poverty, 2011), that “we seem to have fallen on hard times.” Immigration, trade, inequality, and taxation problems present themselves daily, and they seem to be intractable. Economics can be put to use in figuring out these big-issue questions. Data can be adduced, for example, to answer the question of whether immigration tends to suppress wages. The answer: “There is no evidence low-skilled migration to rich countries drives wage and employment down for the natives.” In fact, it opens up opportunities for those natives by freeing them to look for better work. The problem becomes thornier when it comes to the matter of free trade; as the authors observe, “left-behind people live in left-behind places,” which explains why regional poverty descended on Appalachia when so many manufacturing jobs left for China in the age of globalism, leaving behind not just left-behind people but also people ripe for exploitation by nationalist politicians. The authors add, interestingly, that the same thing occurred in parts of Germany, Spain, and Norway that fell victim to the “China shock.” In what they call a “slightly technical aside,” they build a case for addressing trade issues not with trade wars but with consumption taxes: “It makes no sense to ask agricultural workers to lose their jobs just so steelworkers can keep theirs, which is what tariffs accomplish.” Policymakers might want to consider such counsel, especially when it is coupled with the observation that free trade benefits workers in poor countries but punishes workers in rich ones.

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

Pub Date: Nov. 12, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-61039-950-0

Page Count: 432

Publisher: PublicAffairs

Review Posted Online: Aug. 28, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2019

Close Quickview