SEEK AND HIDE

The right to privacy is not a given, as this complicated legal history makes clear.

As law professor Gajda writes, there has been tension between the right to privacy and the right of the free press to publish news since the Colonial era. Nonetheless, the modern period of privacy law begins, by her account, with a specific incident in the late 19th century when a risqué dancer contested the publication of a photograph of her onstage act. The event coincided with the publication of an article by future Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis, whose firm did so brisk a business in privacy-related lawsuits that he felt comfortable turning down one such action by none other than Mark Twain. “The U.S. Supreme Court has never decided precisely when the right to privacy trumps a freedom to publish a truth,” writes Gajda. Instead, the court has referred the matter to the states, which has resulted in a patchwork of laws that serve to highlight the tension even further: “Society needs [privacy], the law is there on which to build, and the only question is, which way do we as a society want to go, especially when the right to privacy is so often pitted against that other critical right, the freedom of expression?” Just as with the Supreme Court, American society seems torn, and the legal pendulum swings, sometimes weighing heavily in favor of the press (as with, for instance, the publication of the Pentagon Papers) and sometimes siding, by omission or commission, with those who claim the right to privacy—Donald Trump and his taxes, to name just one of the author’s examples. Clearly, she concludes, the matter is legislative as much as judicial, such that Congress must weigh in on what constitutes, as one Supreme Court decision framed it, “a subject of legitimate news interest.”

Educative reading for lawyers, journalists, and others who must balance the right to make known with the right to conceal.