DEATHS OF DESPAIR AND THE FUTURE OF CAPITALISM

bookshelf

DEATHS OF DESPAIR AND THE FUTURE OF CAPITALISM

Name: DEATHS OF DESPAIR AND THE FUTURE OF CAPITALISM
Author: Anne Case
ISBN: 978-0-691-19078-5

by Anne Case & Angus Deaton ‧ RELEASE DATE: March 17, 2020

An alarm every bit as urgent as The Jungle and a book that demands immediate attention.

bookshelf

Noted Princeton economists Case and Deaton, a winner of the Nobel Prize, examine the effects of income and educational inequality on public health. As Beth Macy’s Dopesick carefully chronicled, there is a disease afoot in the land, born of economic anxiety, manifested in addiction and self-destruction. Building on a Brookings Institution paper of 2017, Case and Deaton give a name to this epidemic. In 1900, they write, the leading causes of death were infectious diseases such as tuberculosis and cholera. Writing before the unexpected onset of COVID-19, the authors mark the current leading causes as heart disease and cancer. However, especially among the poor and those without a four-year college degree, “the risk of dying in midlife from suicide, accidental drug overdose, or alcoholic liver disease” is markedly higher than in better-educated and more affluent cohorts. Thus the “deaths of despair” of the title, self-inflicted and generationally bound—for, as the authors note with grimly precise data, the chance of such a person’s dying at age 45 in 1960 were half again as high as in 1950, and in 1970 more than twice as high as in 1960. “The later you were born,” they conclude, “the higher your risk of dying a death of despair at any given age.” The epidemic of deaths of young people today to gunshot, cirrhosis, fentanyl and opioid overdosing, and such causes is sober testimonial to the authors’ mathematical reasoning. Non–college educated whites born in 1980, the authors write, are four times more likely to commit suicide as their college-educated white cohorts. Interestingly, the epidemic is not affecting other ethnicities in nearly the same numbers. What has affected nearly every group, however, is another manifestation of despair: obesity, which yields pain and often self-medication, especially among “those who are not at the top.” An alarm every bit as urgent as The Jungle and a book that demands immediate attention.

Pub Date: March 17, 2020

ISBN: 978-0-691-19078-5

Page Count: 312

Publisher: Princeton Univ.

Review Posted Online: April 5, 2020

Categories:

CURRENT EVENTS & SOCIAL ISSUES | POLITICS | ECONOMICS | GENERAL BUSINESS

bookshelf

Awards & Accolades

Likes

157

Our Verdict

GET IT

New York Times Bestseller

ABUNDANCE

by Ezra Klein & Derek Thompson ‧ RELEASE DATE: March 18, 2025

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

bookshelf

Awards & Accolades

Likes

157

Our Verdict

GET IT

New York Times Bestseller

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Categories:

CURRENT EVENTS & SOCIAL ISSUES | BUSINESS | U.S. GOVERNMENT

- PERSPECTIVES
6 Eye-Opening New Books on Power and Politics

bookshelf

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

by Howard Zinn ‧ RELEASE DATE: Jan. 1, 1979

bookshelf

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.