An enjoyably twisty mystery.
When a routine investigation yields evidence of a serious crime, a medical examiner and an anthropologist find themselves in a killer’s crosshairs in this thriller.
Trudy Beasley, the assistant chief medical examiner for Philadelphia, expects the gritty crimes that come with working in a major city, but nothing prepares her for what is unearthed after a gas explosion. Investigators sifting through the rubble find skeletal remains that seem older and unconnected to the incident. In an attempt to learn more about the remains, Trudy contacts Benjamin Roberts, a forensic anthropologist at the University of Pennsylvania. Ben is fascinated by the discovery and estimates that some of the remains are those of a man who died within the last hundred years. (He “shows classic indicators of having used his fists for a living. If I was a betting man, I’d say he was a boxer in his youth.”) When Ben locates a fetal bone, Trudy is convinced a crime occurred. But Ben needs more evidence before he can make an official determination. They soon learn that they are not the only ones who are interested in the remains. Ben receives an email from a college student named Caroline Trey asking to work on the project, and Trudy’s office is vandalized. As the investigation progresses, an attraction develops between Ben and Trudy. While they are determined to identify the remains and find justice for the deceased, they must outwit a criminal who wants to keep the truth buried forever. This third installment of Flade’s Philly Heat series is a fast-paced thriller with the right amount of mystery and romance. Trudy and Ben are likable protagonists whose chemistry is palpable from the first chapter. While their romance is a significant subplot, it does not detract from the central mystery. The investigation of the remains unfolds slowly and methodically, enabling the author to introduce a colorful supporting cast of characters, including Special Agent Noah Danes and Pamela Dryden, a caregiver who harbors many secrets. Flade has a knack for finding opportunities to effectively add suspense to a scene, especially in one sequence in which a date between Ben and Trudy ends with an encounter with a potential stalker.
An enjoyably twisty mystery.Pub Date: Oct. 18, 2022
ISBN: N/A
Page Count: 225
Publisher: Tirgearr Publishing
Review Posted Online: Nov. 18, 2022
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 15, 2023
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
BOOK REVIEW
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.
Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).
A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.Pub Date: June 16, 2020
ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine
Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020
Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK TO SCREEN
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.
A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.
"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019
ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Celadon Books
Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2026 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
