THE PURPLE PRESIDENCY 2024

Paepke, a former practicing attorney, examines divisiveness and political dysfunction in the United States and proposes a plan for moving forward in this nonfiction work.

The author observes that, contrary to popular belief, the ideological polarization that currently beleaguers the United States is not the historical norm; in fact, following World War II, the country leapt “from strength to strength,” and, despite genuine political disagreement, reasonable compromises and consensus among citizens were concretely brokered. However, this is no longer the case—today, the least temperate members of the citizenry elect the least moderate politicians, and deeply divisive figures like Donald Trump and Joe Biden continue to win nominations for the presidency despite their lack of general support. Paepke asserts that this state of affairs has been engendered in part by an irresponsible media that intentionally stokes the flames of political acrimony and by a presidential primary nomination process designed to prefer voters “louder, angrier, and more extreme than mainstream Americans.” The result, in his estimation, has been a loss of shared national identity and purpose. “This extreme political climate has overflowed into broader society and everyday life. The shared sense of community has declined. Americans increasingly choose their states, their neighborhoods, their social lives, and their friends based on political compatibility. The choice of news and information sources too often becomes a definitive pledge of allegiance.” With great clarity and analytical meticulousness, Paepke sketches a sober, centrist political platform—which would seem to have broad appeal among voters—including positions on crime, climate control, and foreign policy. The author offers much more than a lament; he foresees a future in which widespread discontent is channeled into substantive political action and recommends that either the nomination process be radically revised or that the primaries be bypassed altogether by a presidential candidate independent of the two main parties. Paepke’s important and hopeful contribution is an impressive example of what he preaches: a common-sense pragmatism that earnestly seeks out centrist compromise.

A concise and prudent discussion of the nation’s bitter political contentions.