A solid resource for making points or resolving some arguments rather than a collection for casual reading.
This entry in the new Penguin Liberty series digs into a controversial issue that has always polarized the nation.
Brettschneider, a professor of constitutional law at Brown University who also serves as the series editor, offers historical context on presidential impeachment through a selection of documents on the impeachments of three presidents: Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton. Perhaps the perspective on Donald Trump’s impeachment has been deemed too recent for a full analysis, but having three cases without the fourth seems incomplete, and the charges of political partisanship and polarization in the Trump case are certainly connected to the two previous ones. Each of the sections include some of the documentation preceding the impeachment, the Articles of Impeachment from the House of Representatives, and excerpts of the arguments presented before the Senate. In the prefatory material, Brettschneider intriguingly analyzes why the constitutional framers decided that impeachment trials should be conducted by the Senate rather than the Supreme Court. The context provides illumination on two issues that resurfaced during the Trump proceedings: whether the “high crimes and misdemeanors” referenced in the Constitution requires that the president be guilty of criminal activity and whether a sitting president can be prosecuted on criminal charges. The answer to the first would seem to be a resounding “no,” as the annotation shows that the language was particular to impeachment proceedings and not criminal proceedings, while the latter remains a point of contention. One gets the sense that Johnson’s white supremacist obstructionism justified his removal from office, though the specific grounds for his impeachment were much narrower. It’s also clear that Nixon would have lost his case in the Senate had he not resigned. That leaves Clinton and Trump, whose partisans and detractors aren’t likely to find much common ground here.
A solid resource for making points or resolving some arguments rather than a collection for casual reading.Pub Date: Sept. 8, 2020
ISBN: 978-0-14-313510-4
Page Count: 192
Publisher: Penguin
Review Posted Online: May 26, 2020
Kirkus Reviews Issue: June 15, 2020
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.
Helping liberals get out of their own way.
Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.
Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.Pub Date: March 18, 2025
ISBN: 9781668023488
Page Count: 320
Publisher: Avid Reader Press
Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025
BOOK REVIEW
For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.
Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979
ISBN: 0061965588
Page Count: 772
Publisher: Harper & Row
Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
