MULTITUDES

An examination of the rich history of crowds in entertainment, sports, and politics.

A crowd can free people from restrictive social norms while creating a different, temporary set of connections, states Hancox, a London-based freelance journalist and author of The Village Against the World. He argues that crowds allow us to “embrace a bit of chaos in life: to let ourselves go with the flow of the crowd, in order to be more truly ourselves.” This engaging message seems persuasive as Hancox explores carnivals, soccer games, mosh pits, and other examples of crowds. Other parts of the text, however, appear to be primarily vehicles for Hancox’s ideological views; too often it seems he is selecting and shaping evidence rather than letting it speak for itself. For example, he frequently refers to French polymath Gustave Le Bon, who examined his country’s revolutionary violence in a book called The Crowd (1895) and concluded that crowds could easily turn into mobs and therefore had to be controlled. Hancox thoroughly disagrees and makes a fair case for his negative assessment, but devoting so much of his time to arguing with a book published in 1895 looks suspiciously like setting up an ancient straw man instead of providing contemporary examples of fallacious criticisms of crowds. Indeed, Hancox’s position seems to be that crowds connected to liberal or progressive issues are vibrant, articulate demonstrations of democracy, while those connected to right-wing causes are quasi-fascist mobs. He investigates an interesting phenomenon and offers a host of colorful anecdotes, but not all readers will want to wade through his left-leaning politics to find them.

Ideological bias undercuts some interesting analysis.