IN THE SHADOW OF THE IVORY TOWER

Universities have become powerful forces in shaping modern cities, writes urbanist Baldwin, and rarely for the better.

The author, founding director of the Smart Cities Lab at Trinity College, begins in a largely Black neighborhood bordering the University of Chicago, an area being steadily swallowed by the growing campus, a process symbolized by the quiet expropriation of a Bronzeville historical site, a “blues shrine” called the Checkerboard Lounge. “UChicago’s backdoor deal,” writes Baldwin, “resuscitated almost a century of local stories in which the school had either demolished Black neighborhoods or built institutional walls to keep Black residents away from campus.” The temptation to become large-scale property holders is great. As Baldwin notes, given declining student revenues and decreased state funding, colleges and universities are finding that “urban development is higher education’s latest economic growth strategy.” The results are usually harmful to the people, almost always economically disadvantaged minorities and small business owners, who actually live in the downtown areas that universities are turning into “UniverCities.” In the case of Phoenix, the state university built downtown residence high-rises for students, then promulgated the notion that downtown was dangerous, a prejudice that already existed: “students had largely grown up in the suburbs, so they equated the city with danger, even though the [suburban] Tempe campus had higher crime rates.” The same is true in other cities: Chicago, New York, New Haven, the list goes on. Only when campuses venture into privileged areas does their growth sometimes falter: Baldwin cites the expansion of NYU into Greenwich Village that came under scrutiny only when local resident Matthew Broderick opposed it—even though an 8-year-old girl made the better case when she “wondered aloud why college students were incapable of taking a subway for a class or two when she took the train to school every day.” No matter what the opposition, though, the author identifies and critiques a trend that seems unlikely to stop.

A cogent analysis of an urban-growth phenomenon that is rarely done well or equitably.