Next book

AFTER DOBBS

HOW THE SUPREME COURT ENDED ROE BUT NOT ABORTION

Harsh truths paired with a hopeful call to action.

The aftermath of Roe v. Wade.

Cohen and Joffe, both academics, document the stories of 24 people who were directly affected by the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in 2022. Focusing on three intervals in 2022—before Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, immediately after the ruling, and six months later—the authors evoke a sense of urgency while providing evidence of the injustices that people endured as a result of Dobbs. Citing their previous book, Obstacle Course: The Everyday Struggle to Get an Abortion in America, the authors write, “Two of the most consequential barriers people faced were traveling long distances to a clinic and paying for the abortion.” Those barriers, after Dobbs, are only more significant. “In the year following Dobbs,” they write, “the average travel distance to get to an abortion provider jumped from twenty-five to eighty-six miles, almost 3.5 times more.” They relate one harrowing story that made national headlines: the ordeal of a 10-year-old girl who was raped in Ohio—and had to travel to Indiana to get an abortion. Travel is only one expense. Patients also have to cover the cost of child care, and they lose money when they miss work. “American voters have been crystal clear about their outrage that Roe was overturned,” the authors emphasize. Writing before the 2024 election, they conclude, “A Republican victory for the presidency, especially if it is matched by victories in both the House and Senate, could be disastrous for abortion care in the United States.”

Harsh truths paired with a hopeful call to action.

Pub Date: March 25, 2025

ISBN: 9780807017661

Page Count: 240

Publisher: Beacon Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 18, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

ABUNDANCE

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview