bookshelf

TAKEDOWN

Name: TAKEDOWN
Author: Farah Nayeri
ISBN: 978-1-66260-055-5

ART AND POWER IN THE DIGITAL AGE

by Farah Nayeri ‧ RELEASE DATE: Jan. 25, 2022

An eye-opening look at how contemporary political issues find their ways into the hushed halls of museums and galleries.

bookshelf

A broad-ranging account of arts activism.

Should Paul Gauguin be canceled? After all, New York Times arts and culture writer Nayeri notes, he “behaved as if the women and young girls he came across in Tahiti were exotic fruits, there for the picking.” It’s a question that cleaves a sharp division among camps: those who, particularly in Paris, resent the New York Times criticizing French curatorial mores and those who are quick to apply presentist standards of behavior to the past. There’s social justice, and there’s censorship, and sometimes the line between is difficult to discern, though Nayeri contrasts the top-down censorship of state and church with the bottom-up censorship of those who protest injustices based on ethnicity, class, gender, and culture. The author argues that the largest artistic institutions have been playing catch-up. Whereas not long ago one would have to search to find a woman or person of color headlining a show, lately curators have been engaging in provocative installations in which, for example, a work of Picasso is paired with a work by Black American artist Faith Ringgold that features echoes of Guernica, but now visually commenting on the race riots of the late 1960s. “As MoMA explained, this particular display was a way to depart from a purely historical, step-by-step presentation, and start a transgenerational dialogue,” writes Nayeri. Some of the come-lately efforts seem a touch feeble, some a touch desperate, as when, in the wake of the George Floyd murder, curators all over the U.S. and Britain scrambled to remake their exhibits to be more inclusive. Make no mistake, writes the author, inclusion is still lacking. Upon revisiting Ernst Gombrich’s canonical The Story of Art, she writes, “I couldn’t find a single woman artist, even though his book starts in prehistoric times and leads all the way up to American art of the 1950s.”

An eye-opening look at how contemporary political issues find their ways into the hushed halls of museums and galleries.

Pub Date: Jan. 25, 2022

ISBN: 978-1-66260-055-5

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Astra House

Review Posted Online: Oct. 25, 2021

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2021

Categories:

bookshelf

ABUNDANCE

by Ezra Klein & Derek Thompson ‧ RELEASE DATE: March 18, 2025

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

bookshelf

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Categories:

CURRENT EVENTS & SOCIAL ISSUES | BUSINESS | U.S. GOVERNMENT

bookshelf

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

by Howard Zinn ‧ RELEASE DATE: Jan. 1, 1979

bookshelf

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.