A well-paced if sometimes diffuse narrative that raises important questions about capital punishment.
Portrait of a death-row inmate who, unusually, demanded to be killed by the state that imprisoned him.
“It isn’t that I want to die, it’s that I’d rather be dead than do this,” Scott Dozier tells Toboni, a documentary producer who’d happened on news that Dozier was to be executed by the use of fentanyl, having been sentenced to death in Nevada for murder. Dozier, writes Toboni, “wasn’t the sympathetic, unjustly imprisoned inmate I had first imagined for the story,” but he owned up to his crimes without special pleading. When he arrived at the penitentiary, Nevada was “imposing the highest rate of sentences in the nation,” but that suddenly stopped, and Dozier, like so many other death-row inmates, was left in limbo. He demanded that the state live up to its promise to end his life, leading to a string of legal arguments and stays of execution. Toboni occasionally wanders a little far into the weeds in examining other capital cases with seemingly only tenuous connections to Dozier’s, but all illustrate the barbarity of execution: Electrocuted prisoners burst into flames, the hanged jerk on their ropes while strangling, and lethal injections don’t always work (one sympathetic warden promises Dozier to keep extra fentanyl on hand “in the event that the people administering the drug somehow botched the administration of it”). Yet her portrait of Dozier himself is compelling, showing that in most respects he was a model prisoner well liked by almost everyone, prisoners and corrections officers alike, save for one higher-up who took a dislike to him. Interestingly, as Toboni notes, conservative politicians “are starting to tiptoe away from the death penalty” for reasons both fiscal and ideological, which will bear on future death-row inmates. As for Dozier, he found death, but not in the way he had demanded, bringing Toboni’s account to a grimly memorable conclusion.
A well-paced if sometimes diffuse narrative that raises important questions about capital punishment.Pub Date: April 1, 2025
ISBN: 9781668033012
Page Count: 320
Publisher: Atria
Review Posted Online: Feb. 15, 2025
Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 15, 2025
Dogged original research and superb narrative skills come together in this gripping account of pitiless evil.
Greed, depravity, and serial murder in 1920s Oklahoma.
During that time, enrolled members of the Osage Indian nation were among the wealthiest people per capita in the world. The rich oil fields beneath their reservation brought millions of dollars into the tribe annually, distributed to tribal members holding "headrights" that could not be bought or sold but only inherited. This vast wealth attracted the attention of unscrupulous whites who found ways to divert it to themselves by marrying Osage women or by having Osage declared legally incompetent so the whites could fleece them through the administration of their estates. For some, however, these deceptive tactics were not enough, and a plague of violent death—by shooting, poison, orchestrated automobile accident, and bombing—began to decimate the Osage in what they came to call the "Reign of Terror." Corrupt and incompetent law enforcement and judicial systems ensured that the perpetrators were never found or punished until the young J. Edgar Hoover saw cracking these cases as a means of burnishing the reputation of the newly professionalized FBI. Bestselling New Yorkerstaff writer Grann (The Devil and Sherlock Holmes: Tales of Murder, Madness, and Obsession, 2010, etc.) follows Special Agent Tom White and his assistants as they track the killers of one extended Osage family through a closed local culture of greed, bigotry, and lies in pursuit of protection for the survivors and justice for the dead. But he doesn't stop there; relying almost entirely on primary and unpublished sources, the author goes on to expose a web of conspiracy and corruption that extended far wider than even the FBI ever suspected. This page-turner surges forward with the pacing of a true-crime thriller, elevated by Grann's crisp and evocative prose and enhanced by dozens of period photographs.
Dogged original research and superb narrative skills come together in this gripping account of pitiless evil.Pub Date: April 18, 2017
ISBN: 978-0-385-53424-6
Page Count: 352
Publisher: Doubleday
Review Posted Online: Feb. 1, 2017
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2017
BOOK TO SCREEN
BOOK TO SCREEN
BOOK TO SCREEN
Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.
Helping liberals get out of their own way.
Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.
Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.Pub Date: March 18, 2025
ISBN: 9781668023488
Page Count: 320
Publisher: Avid Reader Press
Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
