Next book

EASTERNIZATION

ASIA'S RISE AND AMERICA'S DECLINE: FROM OBAMA TO TRUMP AND BEYOND

A sage, forward-seeing study to be heeded.

A focused delineation of the shifting center of gravity toward Asia and the need for a strenuous Western response without losing global primacy.

Financial Times chief foreign affairs commentator Rachman (Zero-Sum Future: American Power in an Age of Anxiety, 2011), a recent winner of the Orwell Prize, presents a fair, astute assessment of China’s rise during the past few decades in relation to its nervous neighbors and especially the nuanced—and highly criticized—response of President Barack Obama. Neither China nor the U.S. care to fall into the “Thucydides trap,” as defined by China’s President Xi Jinping: avoiding “destructive tensions between an emerging power and established powers.” On one hand, the rise of China corrects the reigning imbalance imposed by the imperial powers during the 19th century and through World War II, when China’s and Japan’s markets were forced open. On the other hand, China’s increasing military might and its muscle-flexing over the Senkaku Islands have become alarming at a time when America has been distracted by Middle Eastern issues and decreased its military spending. The era of China’s “hide and bide” policy under Deng Xiaoping has been replaced by assertive policies, as revealed by the blunt warning issued by the Chinese foreign minister in 2010: “China is a big country and other countries are small countries, and that’s just a fact.” During the recent decades, national rhetoric in China has unmasked a desire for a re-establishment of its “historic grandeur” in the Pacific region. This has deeply troubled neighbors such as South Korea, Japan, and the Southeast Asian nations. Meanwhile, China has doubled down on internal censorship in order to avoid the threat of a “color revolution,” such as those that have occurred in Ukraine and elsewhere. Rachman carefully looks at both India’s and Russia’s roles in the global shift toward “easternization,” and he considers the American and Western response, which has been largely ineffectual since the crises of 2008—although institutions like economic governance and law remain firmly entrenched in the West.

A sage, forward-seeing study to be heeded.

Pub Date: April 4, 2017

ISBN: 978-1-59051-851-9

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Other Press

Review Posted Online: Feb. 18, 2017

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2017

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Next book

I KNOW WHY THE CAGED BIRD SINGS

However charily one should apply the word, a beautiful book, an unconditionally involving memoir for our time or any time.

Maya Angelou is a natural writer with an inordinate sense of life and she has written an exceptional autobiographical narrative which retrieves her first sixteen years from "the general darkness just beyond the great blinkers of childhood."

Her story is told in scenes, ineluctably moving scenes, from the time when she and her brother were sent by her fancy living parents to Stamps, Arkansas, and a grandmother who had the local Store. Displaced they were and "If growing up is painful for the Southern Black girl, being aware of her displacement is the rust on the razor that threatens the throat." But alternating with all the pain and terror (her rape at the age of eight when in St. Louis With her mother) and humiliation (a brief spell in the kitchen of a white woman who refused to remember her name) and fear (of a lynching—and the time they buried afflicted Uncle Willie under a blanket of vegetables) as well as all the unanswered and unanswerable questions, there are affirmative memories and moments: her charming brother Bailey; her own "unshakable God"; a revival meeting in a tent; her 8th grade graduation; and at the end, when she's sixteen, the birth of a baby. Times When as she says "It seemed that the peace of a day's ending was an assurance that the covenant God made with children, Negroes and the crippled was still in effect."

However charily one should apply the word, a beautiful book, an unconditionally involving memoir for our time or any time.

Pub Date: Feb. 1, 1969

ISBN: 0375507892

Page Count: 235

Publisher: Random House

Review Posted Online: May 14, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 1, 1969

Close Quickview