Next book

SNAKES AND EARRINGS

Fascinating and unnerving, though it’s hard to see where Kanehara can go further with such material.

The author was only 20 when she won Japan’s prestigious Akutagawa Prize for this lurid first novel, which will raise a few eyebrows stateside as well.

Narrator Lui (“for Louis Vuitton”) opens by relating her encounter with Ama, who has a forked tongue gotten through piercing followed by cutting, a process he’s happy to describe in skin-crawling detail. Lui, who’s already got enormous holes in her ear lobes, likes the idea of more pain, and when, for her initial tongue-piercing, Ama takes her to Desire, “a kind of punk/alternative store,” she finds, in proprietor Shiba-san, someone happy to inflict it. Soon Lui is living with Ama, something of a wimp with her but tough enough to beat a man to death on the street and to have sadomasochistic sex with Shiba-san on the side. Kanehara’s flat-affect portrait of teenagers operating totally outside traditional Japanese social constraints is both shocking and, from time to time, oddly touching: after telling Lui that “seeing you suffer makes me so hard,” Shiba-san asks her to be his girlfriend, adding, “if we did get together, it would be with marriage in mind.” The particulars are Japanese, but Lui’s declaration, “I wanted to live recklessly and leave nothing but ashes in this dark, dull world,” is the cry of alienated youth anywhere. Like the narrator, we grow oddly fond of her two messed-up guys, both emotionally pathetic but extremely dangerous. A bloody denouement and Lui’s passive acceptance of it prove more disturbing than might be expected, given the story's brevity and deadpan delivery of the grossest facts. There’s a peculiar, haunting beauty to her final question as she backs off from completing the tongue forking: “Was this really what I had been chasing after? A useless, empty hole surrounded by raw flesh glistening with spittle?”

Fascinating and unnerving, though it’s hard to see where Kanehara can go further with such material.

Pub Date: May 23, 2005

ISBN: 0-525-94889-9

Page Count: 128

Publisher: Dutton

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 15, 2005

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 248


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 248


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 39


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 39


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview