Kirkus Reviews QR Code
THE RIDDLE OF THE ROSETTA by Jed Z. Buchwald

THE RIDDLE OF THE ROSETTA

How an English Polymath and a French Polyglot Discovered the Meaning of Egyptian Hieroglyphs

by Jed Z. Buchwald & Diane Greco Josefowicz

Pub Date: Sept. 15th, 2020
ISBN: 978-0-691-20090-3
Publisher: Princeton Univ.

Comprehensive account of a dense and daunting project: deciphering ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics two millennia after their composition.

Buchwald, a historian at California Institute of Technology, and writer Josefowicz put a decade’s worth of work into this book, and it shows. Their story begins with a stone tablet bearing three inscriptions, one in ancient Greek, one in hieroglyphic Egyptian, and one in demotic (or “Coptic”) script. French troops had mauled it to keep it from their British enemies during the Napoleonic Wars, but the damage wasn’t catastrophic, and the tablet was hauled off as a spoil of war, delivered to London in 1802. British scientists puzzled over the thing and then published not entirely accurate lithographs of the Rosetta Stone that found their way into scholarly journals in Britain and France. Enter Jean-François Champollion, “a fiery Bonapartist…[who] narrowly avoided incarceration and worse during the Bourbon Restoration.” An atheist and freethinker, Champollion set to work with an idea that was shared by Thomas Young, an older, pious Englishman who was much better grounded in mathematics (and thus cryptography): that the texts said the same thing, so that using the Greek, which was known, one might figure out the corresponding Egyptian characters. Both worked on their translations for years, sometimes sniping at, sometimes collaborating with each other. Buchwald and Josefowicz deliver an account that sometimes seems as if in real time, describing the blind alleys, intuitions, and thorny debates that surrounded the scholars’ investigations. For example, “Young happily conceded that orthographic shifts could and did occur as writers labored to effect accurate transcriptions…[but] maintained that Egyptian hieroglyphs had never changed from the originals, neither in shape nor in meaning.” Readers will find some grounding in linguistics to be helpful, as the authors discuss phonetics, phonemics, morphemics, and other technical matters surrounding whether the hieroglyphics in particular represented sounds, words, or concepts—the answer being “all of the above.”

Knowledgeable fans of Egyptology, cryptography, and languages will enjoy this exploration of the ancient past.