A sharp-edged work of legal journalism that will fascinate politics junkies.
Legal commentator Toobin examines the power of presidents to pardon others—and perhaps themselves.
“There is…no check or balance on the president’s power to pardon. It is the provision of the Constitution most directly descended from the authority of kings of England,” writes Toobin. His exemplar throughout is Richard Nixon, who might have pardoned those whose work led to his downfall but instead sought precedent that would allow him to pardon himself. Some of his advisers, especially Al Haig, argued that whatever the Constitution does not specifically prohibit is permitted, while a legal opinion from the Justice Department likened self-pardon to a judge conducting his own trial. Nixon negotiated a pardon from Gerald Ford, who had earlier promised the public that he would not grant one; what swayed Ford were documents that Nixon had squirreled away, much as Donald Trump did at the end of his first term. “Seen in this way,” writes Toobin, “Nixon used his papers as a form of extortion—and it worked.” Trump, too, has studied self-pardon, tweeting with characteristic bombast, “As has been stated by numerous legal scholars, I have the absolute right to PARDON myself, but why would I do that when I have done nothing wrong?” Ford took a shellacking for pardoning Nixon, although Toobin persuasively argues that the pardon wasn’t the make-or-break reason for his defeat in the 1976 election that it has been made out to be. Interestingly, too, Toobin observes that had Nixon looked beyond his close circle of advisers, he would have discovered that the Justice Department “had no intention of prosecuting Nixon,” just as, it seems, the department is walking away from Trump.
A sharp-edged work of legal journalism that will fascinate politics junkies.Pub Date: Feb. 11, 2025
ISBN: 9781668084946
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Review Posted Online: Dec. 24, 2024
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 1, 2025
For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.
Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979
ISBN: 0061965588
Page Count: 772
Publisher: Harper & Row
Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
A fierce, penetrating, and empowering call for change.
Artist and activist Vaid-Menon demonstrates how the normativity of the gender binary represses creativity and inflicts physical and emotional violence.
The author, whose parents emigrated from India, writes about how enforcement of the gender binary begins before birth and affects people in all stages of life, with people of color being especially vulnerable due to Western conceptions of gender as binary. Gender assignments create a narrative for how a person should behave, what they are allowed to like or wear, and how they express themself. Punishment of nonconformity leads to an inseparable link between gender and shame. Vaid-Menon challenges familiar arguments against gender nonconformity, breaking them down into four categories—dismissal, inconvenience, biology, and the slippery slope (fear of the consequences of acceptance). Headers in bold font create an accessible navigation experience from one analysis to the next. The prose maintains a conversational tone that feels as intimate and vulnerable as talking with a best friend. At the same time, the author's turns of phrase in moments of deep insight ring with precision and poetry. In one reflection, they write, “the most lethal part of the human body is not the fist; it is the eye. What people see and how people see it has everything to do with power.” While this short essay speaks honestly of pain and injustice, it concludes with encouragement and an invitation into a future that celebrates transformation.
A fierce, penetrating, and empowering call for change. (writing prompt) (Nonfiction. 14-adult)Pub Date: June 2, 2020
ISBN: 978-0-593-09465-5
Page Count: 64
Publisher: Penguin Workshop
Review Posted Online: March 14, 2020
Kirkus Reviews Issue: April 1, 2020
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
