An insightful account of the glue that binds one of the dominant strains of conservatism and threatens liberal democracy.
A sociological study of gun sellers and the way their politics sustain gun rights as a defining element of American conservatism.
One of the consequences of the 2020 pandemic was a surge in gun sales—not just to the typical White, straight, conservative, male buyer, but also to women, racial and sexual minorities, and liberals. Carlson, professor of sociology at the University of Arizona, author of Policing the Second Amendment, and a 2022 MacArthur fellow, saw this as an opportunity to gauge “how American gun culture [is] defended as conservative terrain” and how gun sellers act as “merchants of conservative thought.” Interviewing 50 sellers from four states, the author chronicles their responses to the pandemic, the new buyers, and activist initiatives such as Black Lives Matter. Their thinking coalesces around three ideas: Owning a gun reinforces personal responsibility (armed individualism); behind all official stories and state action are “hidden power brokers” (conspiracism); and defining the boundaries of citizenship is a democratic necessity (extreme partisanship). This information allowed Carlson to group sellers into libertarians who cast individual rights as the “preferred remedy to social ills”; illiberal conservatives, who embrace democracy but narrow the concept of “the people” to those who share their beliefs (thereby excluding liberals); and eclectic conservatives, who balance individual rights with collective obligations. For each, defending gun rights is “a means of defining” democracy and protecting political rights. In contrast, Carlson favors a liberal democracy that is “consensus-based, justice-oriented, and equity-driven” and can assert political equanimity, civic grace, and awareness of shared vulnerability to bridge the current political divide. The author treats her subjects with respect and intellectual generosity, and her positioning of gun culture in democratic thought is a model of thoughtful scholarship.
An insightful account of the glue that binds one of the dominant strains of conservatism and threatens liberal democracy.Pub Date: May 2, 2023
ISBN: 9780691230399
Page Count: 288
Publisher: Princeton Univ.
Review Posted Online: Jan. 25, 2023
Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2023
BOOK REVIEW
Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.
Helping liberals get out of their own way.
Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.
Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.Pub Date: March 18, 2025
ISBN: 9781668023488
Page Count: 320
Publisher: Avid Reader Press
Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025
BOOK REVIEW
For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.
Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979
ISBN: 0061965588
Page Count: 772
Publisher: Harper & Row
Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
