Washington Post writer Rubin delivers a thoughtful study of the critical role of women in containing and defeating Donald Trump.
There were plenty of Republican women who supported Trump’s nationalist, White supremacist regime. Upon his election in 2016, writes the author, “I steeled myself for the likelihood that Republicans would countenance reckless and even illegal behavior.” Which they did, to destructive effect. But there were plenty of others who were determined to fight Trump’s policies. Many left the Republican Party as a result of his election since the signals were strong that women would have little in the way of a meaningful role in the new administration—unless their name was Ivanka. Many more organized, ran for office, joined grassroots organizations, and donated time and money. Rubin ponders numerous questions that may in fact be imponderable, including the central one of the moment: Why wasn’t Hillary Clinton elected? The answer may hinge in part on her weakness as a campaigner; more likely, writes the author, it was simple misogyny at work. Whatever the case, the resistance of women had an immediate effect, proven in the 2018 midterm elections, when, in formerly Republican Virginia the Democrats fielded a record number of women candidates at all levels of government, including a transgender woman, Asians and Pacific Islanders, and a self-identified lesbian. All won. Even in Alabama, “every single county swung left compared to 2016,” while in Georgia, Stacey Abrams, foreseeing legislation that would attempt to suppress the minority vote, enrolled more than 1 million Black voters. (Rubin correctly notes that if women were the principal change agents in 2018 and 2020, Black women were at the absolute center of the movement.) A sleeping giant thus awakened, Rubin holds that no one should imagine that women will now sit back and allow Trump to return, since, after all, he “taught us the unacceptable price of passivity.”
An excellent contribution to the literature of contemporary electoral politics.