Next book

ANY GIVEN TUESDAY

A POLITICAL LOVE STORY

Would-be political staffers will find valuable pointers of both the inspirational and cover-your-ass varieties.

A longtime political operative recounts the thrills and spills of electoral politics.

Early on, Smith recounts a phone call in which an adviser to Andrew Cuomo told him to cut out his feeble protestations concerning inappropriate behavior toward female staffers: “Don’t bullshit yourself or us.” It took Smith a few years to find the gumption to tell off senior politicos, but she evolved, even ifshe had a perhaps inappropriate (in the view of the New York tabloids, anyway) relationship with Cuomo’s political nemesis, Eliot Spitzer. The author is clearly not fond of Cuomo (“America’s governor was quickly turning into America’s asshole”), nor Bill De Blasio, who taught her “an important lesson in the hardest way possible: nothing, not even burning ambition, could justify working for a politician with no integrity.” On the positive front, Smith evinces respect for Barack Obama. One memorable anecdote involves the Obama campaign war room going into crisis mode when a Democratic governor questioned Mitt Romney’s religion, a forbidden tactic that, Smith writes, “could backfire and transform the wooden, unlikable Romney into a victim and a sympathetic figure.” High on the list of the bad and ugly is Donald Trump, and Smith, generally a competent but not compelling writer, paints a portrait of former boss Pete Buttigieg as his polar opposite, a good man of deep integrity and intelligence, if also given to “ill-fitting suits.” The author’s character studies of politicians in action seldom go deep, but what counts is that action indeed. Smith offers capable descriptions of how retail politics works as well as all that goes along with it, such as dressing for success and handling the press—as when she threatened a reporter that she’d “shove [his] balls down his throat” if he burned her on an off-the-record comment.

Would-be political staffers will find valuable pointers of both the inspirational and cover-your-ass varieties.

Pub Date: July 12, 2022

ISBN: 978-0-06-308439-1

Page Count: 288

Publisher: Harper/HarperCollins

Review Posted Online: July 27, 2022

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 11


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

ABUNDANCE

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 11


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview