DANGEROUS FICTIONS

What good is fiction?

Journalist Gold makes an incisive book debut with a thoughtful, often witty, examination of the causes and consequences of banning novels. “Most of the time,” she writes, “when we get anxious about the effects of fiction, we’re worried about mimetic responses—not so much from ourselves but from other people.” From ancient Greece to present-day America, book banners claim that they are protecting readers from ideas about reality that would harm them or undermine the community’s values. To Plato, for example, tales of gods behaving badly were “always endorsement and a social license for bad behavior.” Gold skewers the justification used by right-wingers that readers—especially children—will mistake a story for reality, “and that this mistake will lead them into unhealthy or disreputable situations.” “Cancel culture,” Gold contends, though not as virulent as outright banning, arises from the same “misguided presumptions” about fiction’s insidious power. For Gold, the crucial question is this: “How much can we expect of art and entertainment to fix our problems with reality, especially under our current economic and political system?” Gold refutes assertions from the left that “viewing and promoting something that the far right dislikes” is “a political act in itself,” and a virtuous act, at that. Reading about climate change, she reminds readers, doesn’t stop global warming. Gold looks at sci-fi, video games, movies, and TV to argue that media companies produce what is in their “financial best interest.” If an anti-capitalist novel were published, she writes, “it would just be a novel: it wouldn’t affect capitalism one way or another.” Still, Gold extols the impact of fiction: “We’re transformed by great writing,” she claims, “not beyond our own powers and capabilities but into them.”

A savvy contribution to current debates.