Next book

VALFIERNO

THE MAN WHO STOLE THE MONA LISA

Luxurious and intelligent look at identity, class and art—all in an intriguing story based on real events.

The man behind the theft of the Mona Lisa discusses his multiple identities and adventures in leisurely detail to an American reporter.

Argentine novelist, travel writer, memoirist and reporter Caparrós, in supple self-effacing translation, takes ample time to lay out the histories of the “Marqués de Valfierno,” the name that Juan María Bonaglia, bright child of an Italian housemaid in turn-of-the-20th century Argentina, calls himself in his middle age, having assumed several identities to suit several circumstances in his lifetime. The impersonations began as the toddler Bonaglia looked for ways to fit in with the rich members of the household employing Annunziata, his naïve and doting mum. The head of the household took enough of a fancy to the bright lad to send him to the local day school. Between home and school, the child learns enough to know that he will always wonder who he is. The good times end when Annunziata is accused of jewelry theft, unaware that her son is to blame. Exiled from paradise, the two scramble to stay alive. Bonaglia works in a succession of jobs that lead to bookkeeping in a bordello, where he meets Yves Chaudron, the man whose special skills will lead him to the ultimate art heist. Chaudron paints like a dream, but only as a copyist. Unable to create from life, he knocks off anything in two dimensions, including masterworks. Using his chameleon skills to pass himself off as an aristocrat, Bonaglia becomes Valfierno, a noble from the pampas with as many family artworks as Chaudron can crank out to sell to Buenos Aires nouveaux riches. When his cover is blown by another faker, the two ship off to Paris to start over. There Valfierno hooks up with Valérie, a demi-mondaine who just happens to know a guy with a job in the Louvre, and the plans for lifting La Joconde take shape.

Luxurious and intelligent look at identity, class and art—all in an intriguing story based on real events.

Pub Date: July 15, 2008

ISBN: 978-0-7432-9793-6

Page Count: 340

Publisher: Atria

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: May 1, 2008

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 228


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

DEVOLUTION

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 228


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).

A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.

A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.

Pub Date: June 16, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine

Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020

Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 36


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

Next book

THE SILENT PATIENT

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 36


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • IndieBound Bestseller

A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.

"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.

Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.

Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Celadon Books

Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018

Close Quickview