bookshelf

REVENGE

Name: REVENGE
Author: Michael Cohen
ISBN: 978-1-68589-054-4

HOW DONALD TRUMP WEAPONIZED THE US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AGAINST HIS CRITICS

by Michael Cohen ‧ RELEASE DATE: Oct. 11, 2022

Angry and sometimes scattershot, a footnote to more comprehensive accounts of Trumpian malfeasance.

bookshelf

The former president’s former counsel rages against his former boss.

“Donald Trump is the mirror into the depth of the soul of government corruption,” writes Cohen. “He is the standard bearer for corrupt dictator wannabes. He is the poster boy for fascism.” The author was one of countless Trump staffers to be thrown under the bus when legal trouble threatened, in this case because of a payment to Stormy Daniels. Cohen clearly seeks revenge for the time he spent in a country-club federal prison—nicknamed Camp Cupcake—where, “if you wanted to break out, you merely needed to call an Uber.” But revenge cuts both ways: Cohen argues that the Justice Department was wholly under the sway of a vengeful Trump and weaponized to punish anyone he targeted. In Cohen’s case, punishment came in the form of imprisonment for tax evasion—even though, he insists, it was a “tax omission.” The IRS was the weaponized agency, argues the author, that illegally leaked information about him to other agencies, but leading the charge was the FBI, which “was corrupt, vindictive, and intellectually lazy.” Moreover, he insists, everyone in the FBI at the time of his trial was “guilty of subverting justice.” Given recent, deeper-diving reports on the wholesale compromise of DOJ under the reign of William Barr, Cohen’s accusations are often glancing. Still, when he’s not spitting bile (of his work for Trump, for example, he writes, “the biggest part of my job was covering for his fat ass”), he hits a few points: It’s a fact that when Trump—“an orange-faced piece of shit who ran roughshod over the Constitution”—called for Russia to investigate Hillary Clinton’s emails, Russia did so instantly, and it’s a fact that the disproportionate sentencing so common in justice circles can be, and is, used as a political weapon.

Angry and sometimes scattershot, a footnote to more comprehensive accounts of Trumpian malfeasance.

Pub Date: Oct. 11, 2022

ISBN: 978-1-68589-054-4

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Melville House

Review Posted Online: Oct. 12, 2022

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2022

Categories:

bookshelf

ABUNDANCE

by Ezra Klein & Derek Thompson ‧ RELEASE DATE: March 18, 2025

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

bookshelf

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Categories:

CURRENT EVENTS & SOCIAL ISSUES | BUSINESS | U.S. GOVERNMENT

bookshelf

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

by Howard Zinn ‧ RELEASE DATE: Jan. 1, 1979

bookshelf

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.