This cautionary tale urges an informed American electorate to pay close attention to the misdeeds of those in power.
A debut political thriller delivers a plot built on right-wing conspiracy theories.
Pinsky offers a scenario where the outgoing American president dislikes the candidates vying to replace him, in a narrative that borrows liberally from the recent election. So this Democratic incumbent develops a complicated plan to generate crises that will allow him to cancel the election and become, in essence, dictator of the United States. This is to be accomplished by terrorists smuggled in among Syrian refugees, increasingly armed federal agencies, and a reduced standing military. The bombastic Republican candidate, Austin Howard, senses something is amiss, but is too busy squabbling with his many opponents to truly divine the president’s scheme. Howard feels he’s blessed with a unique vision that not many appreciate: “Howard was neither a racist nor a xenophobe. But without a national language, with nothing else to bind us together, America could, in time, become another Yugoslavia.” Instead it’s William Mendenhall, a general fired by the president, who begins to connect the dots: “The thoughts eating away at his fabric of reality would not go away.” As Mendenhall pieces together the enormity of the president’s stratagem, he gathers together a coalition of former military and militia members and Republican politicians to wage a guerrilla war against the commander in chief’s efforts to suspend the democratic process and impose martial law. Pinsky has created a well-paced narrative that leads to a climactic confrontation near Washington, D.C. He shows a deep understanding of the policies and concerns that divide this nation. His characters’ motivations are fully delineated, so that readers can understand the players’ rationales, even if they don’t agree with them. But the author draws too deeply from the endless wellspring of “alt-right” conspiracies, targeting such issues as immigration, gun control, and welfare programs as the causes of a weakened America. If this is supposed to be a satire, that’s not readily apparent. Still, the novel works as an indictment of extremism of any kind.
This cautionary tale urges an informed American electorate to pay close attention to the misdeeds of those in power.Pub Date: Oct. 31, 2016
ISBN: 978-1-5245-5139-1
Page Count: 298
Publisher: Xlibris
Review Posted Online: March 20, 2017
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.
Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).
A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.Pub Date: June 16, 2020
ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine
Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020
Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK TO SCREEN
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.
A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.
"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019
ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Celadon Books
Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
