WANTS VS. NEEDS VS. ROBOTS

A tangible way to help younger kids look at an economic principle.

An unseen narrator defines needsas “something you cannot survive without.” Robots need “batteries for power. Arms to do work. Legs to move. Oil so they run smoothly.” Smiling, appealing, anthropomorphized automatons begin to understand the difference between wants and needs as they think about their desires: “fancy sunglasses, jelly-bean tacos, unicorn hats, and golden ukuleles.” Then the concept of trading comes into play. How can one robot acquire a coveted object owned by another? The red robot gives away their oil for a shirt, barters their arms and legs for boots and a remote-controlled platypus, and exchanges their battery for a cake. Eventually, the red robot ends up slumped over the cake, smoke emanating from their body (“What a mess! See what happens when you don’t balance your wants and needs?”). Rex did an admirable job explaining important concepts in a fun way with Facts vs. Opinions vs. Robots (2020), but he stumbles here by referring to arms and legs as needs. Since the robots are human stand-ins, the book inadvertently implies that those with limb differences are living lesser lives. The author makes his point, but using needs other than limbs—a dry environment, programming—might have been just as effective and more empathetic. (This book was reviewed digitally.)

An unintended ableist viewpoint mars a playful examination of the difference between needs and desires.