Next book

HER BODY, OUR LAWS

ON THE FRONTLINES OF THE ABORTION WAR FROM EL SALVADOR TO OKLAHOMA

A brief but sensible entry in the abortion wars.

A law professor brings her learned perspective and anecdotal evidence to one of the world’s most controversial topics.

A former Planned Parenthood volunteer, Oberman (Santa Clara Univ. School of Law; When Mothers Kill, 2008) admits her pro–abortion rights stance, but her short book rarely veers toward polemic. Instead, she shows how those on both sides tend to marginalize the women whose lives are already marginalized and that, for those women, “abortion’s legal status hardly mattered.” The author predicts that if the anti-abortion movement continues to gain momentum, laws against abortion won’t stop them or even decrease them. Her approach is somewhat scattershot, but she focuses first on El Salvador, which “has the strictest abortion laws in the world.” Since the passage of an absolute ban in 1998, the abortion rate has not dropped; enforcement is selective and charges are rare, mainly brought upon women in dire circumstances, many of whom have suffered a miscarriage or lack of prenatal care but haven’t submitted to the abortion procedure. Furthermore, writes Oberman, “the rate of abortion in countries with restrictive abortion laws far exceeds that of countries with far more liberal laws, as in the United States.” She suggests that those campaigning hardest to reverse the liberalization of abortion policy are mainly engaged in moral posturing, knowing that the procedure they condemn will not decrease but will be increasingly stigmatized and driven underground—or to the internet, where drugs that can terminate a pregnancy are far safer than the old cliché of the back-alley abortionist. Perhaps the most illuminating part of the book concerns the compassion the author found at Birth Choice, which offers a safe haven for women who keep their babies and where there is “no shame, just love.” There she heard that there are “two kinds of pro-life people. People who are pro-life and people who are antiabortion…and the antiabortion folks are really difficult to work with.”

A brief but sensible entry in the abortion wars.

Pub Date: Jan. 16, 2018

ISBN: 978-0-8070-4552-7

Page Count: 192

Publisher: Beacon Press

Review Posted Online: Oct. 29, 2017

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2017

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Next book

GOOD ECONOMICS FOR HARD TIMES

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

“Quality of life means more than just consumption”: Two MIT economists urge that a smarter, more politically aware economics be brought to bear on social issues.

It’s no secret, write Banerjee and Duflo (co-authors: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way To Fight Global Poverty, 2011), that “we seem to have fallen on hard times.” Immigration, trade, inequality, and taxation problems present themselves daily, and they seem to be intractable. Economics can be put to use in figuring out these big-issue questions. Data can be adduced, for example, to answer the question of whether immigration tends to suppress wages. The answer: “There is no evidence low-skilled migration to rich countries drives wage and employment down for the natives.” In fact, it opens up opportunities for those natives by freeing them to look for better work. The problem becomes thornier when it comes to the matter of free trade; as the authors observe, “left-behind people live in left-behind places,” which explains why regional poverty descended on Appalachia when so many manufacturing jobs left for China in the age of globalism, leaving behind not just left-behind people but also people ripe for exploitation by nationalist politicians. The authors add, interestingly, that the same thing occurred in parts of Germany, Spain, and Norway that fell victim to the “China shock.” In what they call a “slightly technical aside,” they build a case for addressing trade issues not with trade wars but with consumption taxes: “It makes no sense to ask agricultural workers to lose their jobs just so steelworkers can keep theirs, which is what tariffs accomplish.” Policymakers might want to consider such counsel, especially when it is coupled with the observation that free trade benefits workers in poor countries but punishes workers in rich ones.

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

Pub Date: Nov. 12, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-61039-950-0

Page Count: 432

Publisher: PublicAffairs

Review Posted Online: Aug. 28, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2019

Close Quickview