POLICING WHITE SUPREMACY

A former FBI agent examines what he says are the agency’s failures to monitor and thwart the radical right.

The FBI, German holds, “refuses to prioritize investigations of violence by white supremacists.” Instead, he adds, the bureau focuses on less dangerous groups such as Black Lives Matter, even though “far-right militants have committed over one hundred deadly acts just since the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia.” Notable among those acts was the storming of the Capitol, about which, just as with that rally, the agency had plenty of advance intelligence but did not act on it, German says—even as one Washington hotel, sensing trouble, chose to close its bar, popular among Proud Boys and their ilk, between Jan. 4 and 6. If a bar can do it, why can’t the feds? German suggests that intelligence failures have a willful component: In the Trump era, he holds, “law enforcement bias became much more overt,” and that bias was all too often tilted against minorities and inclined to overlook violence perpetrated by white supremacists and the far right; indeed, German notes, he left the agency after whistleblowing on the FBI’s post-9/11 focus on “perceived threats from Muslim, Black, Native American, and immigrant activists, environmentalists, and progressive protest groups” instead of real threats from white supremacists. As a result, German holds, these groups have become emboldened. Serious systematic and institutional reforms are needed, says German, who, now a policy fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice, urges, “It is time for the FBI to reverse its shift toward broad intelligence collection about innocent Americans and to refocus investigations where facts establish reasonable indications of violence and criminality.”

An urgent call for a different approach to policing and containing radical right-wing violence.