Next book

AFTER THE APPLE

WOMEN IN THE BIBLE: TIMELESS STORIES OF LOVE, LUST, AND LONGING

If you like Anita Diamant and Vanessa Ochs, you may be tempted to pick up this book. But don’t—it’ll disappoint you.

A ho-hum investigation of the Bible’s leading ladies.

The Bible often says little about women, or says it tersely—not indicating, for example, how a woman might have felt about having her only son nearly sacrificed. There’s now something of a cottage-industry in retelling these women’s stories, filling in the gaps, doing, if you will, modern-day Midrash.Here, marriage counselor and psychoanalyst Rosenblatt offers reflections on 17 women from Hebrew Scripture, all cast in an encouraging second-wave-feminist light. Think the Matriarchs are doormats? Think again—they’re crafty, wise women, keeping their wits about them to promote their own interests and those of their households. Eve (who does appear, despite the book’s title) is a “trailblazer,” Delilah independent and resourceful. Abigail, one of King David’s wives, thinks being a woman is really cool, as does the Queen of Sheba. Bathsheba, another Mrs. David, is courageous and strong. In the main, Rosenblatt’s readings tend toward the predictable, and they’re more simplistic than they might have been had the author made fuller use of the treasures of rabbinic lore on these women. Unfortunately, neither is there much literary flair in evidence—and too-clever asides can leave you cringing (after musing, in the chapter on the Song of Songs, that we moderns know less about sex and intimacy than our grandparents, Rosenblatt continues with, “Now that we’ve broken through the crass ceiling . . . ”). Efforts to give advice about marriage as gleaned from the biblical stories result mainly in banalities. In a chapter on Bathsheba, for example, Rosenblatt councils husbands and wives not to break up a marriage over a one-night stand, and Adam and Eve lead readers to realize that “Spouses in a healthy. . . relationship praise and appreciate the strengths. . . of their mates.”

If you like Anita Diamant and Vanessa Ochs, you may be tempted to pick up this book. But don’t—it’ll disappoint you.

Pub Date: March 22, 2005

ISBN: 0-7868-6908-9

Page Count: 288

Publisher: N/A

Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 2005

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 25


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


Google Rating

  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating

  • Kirkus Reviews'
    Best Books Of 2016


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • Pulitzer Prize Finalist

Next book

WHEN BREATH BECOMES AIR

A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular...

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 25


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


Google Rating

  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating
  • google rating

  • Kirkus Reviews'
    Best Books Of 2016


  • New York Times Bestseller


  • Pulitzer Prize Finalist

A neurosurgeon with a passion for literature tragically finds his perfect subject after his diagnosis of terminal lung cancer.

Writing isn’t brain surgery, but it’s rare when someone adept at the latter is also so accomplished at the former. Searching for meaning and purpose in his life, Kalanithi pursued a doctorate in literature and had felt certain that he wouldn’t enter the field of medicine, in which his father and other members of his family excelled. “But I couldn’t let go of the question,” he writes, after realizing that his goals “didn’t quite fit in an English department.” “Where did biology, morality, literature and philosophy intersect?” So he decided to set aside his doctoral dissertation and belatedly prepare for medical school, which “would allow me a chance to find answers that are not in books, to find a different sort of sublime, to forge relationships with the suffering, and to keep following the question of what makes human life meaningful, even in the face of death and decay.” The author’s empathy undoubtedly made him an exceptional doctor, and the precision of his prose—as well as the moral purpose underscoring it—suggests that he could have written a good book on any subject he chose. Part of what makes this book so essential is the fact that it was written under a death sentence following the diagnosis that upended his life, just as he was preparing to end his residency and attract offers at the top of his profession. Kalanithi learned he might have 10 years to live or perhaps five. Should he return to neurosurgery (he could and did), or should he write (he also did)? Should he and his wife have a baby? They did, eight months before he died, which was less than two years after the original diagnosis. “The fact of death is unsettling,” he understates. “Yet there is no other way to live.”

A moving meditation on mortality by a gifted writer whose dual perspectives of physician and patient provide a singular clarity.

Pub Date: Jan. 19, 2016

ISBN: 978-0-8129-8840-6

Page Count: 248

Publisher: Random House

Review Posted Online: Sept. 29, 2015

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Oct. 15, 2015

Close Quickview