A scorching exposé of the inner workings of the two impeachments of Donald Trump, driven less by constitutional principle than by political calculation.
At every moment of the first Trump impeachment, write veteran political reporters Bade and Demirjian, the principal players in both parties gamed outcomes in an effort to inflict maximal damage on each other. “While Democrats said they wanted bipartisanship,” they write, “when presented with ways to achieve it, they chose paths that guaranteed the opposite.” GOP figures from Mitch McConnell on down forgot their scruples and closed ranks to defend the indefensible. Nancy Pelosi took dangerous procedural shortcuts and effectively hamstrung the House prosecutors’ ability to present an airtight case—and never properly responded to Trump’s refusal to hand over subpoenaed documents. Moderate Republicans such as Jaime Herrera Beutler, who might have voted to impeach, were pushed away by the determination of Democrats to go it alone, lending the proceedings an air of secrecy. If a moderate were rebuffed, then Republican House leader Kevin McCarthy had no problem steering the rest of the conference into opposition. The second impeachment, against the backdrop of the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol, was even less well managed. Most Republicans argued that Trump won the 2020 election, while ace Democratic prosecutor Adam Schiff pressed for recourse to the 25th amendment rather than a slower impeachment trial. “At the speaker’s personal request,” write the authors, “he’d been making the case…that if they went after the president in his waning days in office, it would look like they were just trying to keep him from running again.” In the end, Bade and Demirjian argue in this comprehensive narrative, both sides of the aisle compromised and devalued the constitutional power of impeachment, opening the door to its future use as “an everyday vehicle to express the heights of partisan rage.”
A must-read for students of the Trump years and their dreary denouement.