Next book

HOMELAND

THE WAR ON TERROR IN AMERICAN LIFE

A well-reasoned, evenhanded account of the cost we’ve paid at home for chasing terrorists abroad.

The war on terror comes home to roost.

Beck was 14 when the Twin Towers collapsed in 2001, an event that his Philadelphia school’s administrators overlooked in the interest of pursuing a regular learning day of quizzes and lectures. Once home, he was bombarded, like everyone else, with images of “the most visually spectacular attack in the history of armed conflict.” Soon enough, the country mostly united in its resolve to hunt down the terrorists, the images would grow more obscure, and “the war grew difficult to see.” By Beck’s account, the global war on terror has proven at every point an unwinnable boondoggle with numerous ill effects, not least the rise of the security state in the U.S. A case in point, Beck writes, is the new World Trade Center, built atop the ashes of the old one, “a dead zone” of “bollards, surveillance booths, and sally ports” that, while impeding the heavy foot traffic of the old WTC, does nothing to protect the place against a committed suicide bomber. The post-9/11 militarism that swept America, Beck conjectures, “did nothing to make people safer, and it didn’t make people feel safer, either.” Indeed, the gloomy pallor of paranoia was perfectly in keeping with an ever more unequal economy and the renewal of the 1960s-era culture wars, with anyone who dared question American policy canceled, from Susan Sontag to Bill Maher to the Dixie Chicks. Beck makes some long reaches that turn out to be quite reasonable, upon further reflection. For one, is it any surprise that social media corporations should join the security state in furthering technologies meant to aid in “knowing as much as possible about as many people as possible following September 11”?

A well-reasoned, evenhanded account of the cost we’ve paid at home for chasing terrorists abroad.

Pub Date: Sept. 3, 2024

ISBN: 9780593240229

Page Count: 592

Publisher: Crown

Review Posted Online: June 25, 2024

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2024

Next book

GOOD ECONOMICS FOR HARD TIMES

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

“Quality of life means more than just consumption”: Two MIT economists urge that a smarter, more politically aware economics be brought to bear on social issues.

It’s no secret, write Banerjee and Duflo (co-authors: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way To Fight Global Poverty, 2011), that “we seem to have fallen on hard times.” Immigration, trade, inequality, and taxation problems present themselves daily, and they seem to be intractable. Economics can be put to use in figuring out these big-issue questions. Data can be adduced, for example, to answer the question of whether immigration tends to suppress wages. The answer: “There is no evidence low-skilled migration to rich countries drives wage and employment down for the natives.” In fact, it opens up opportunities for those natives by freeing them to look for better work. The problem becomes thornier when it comes to the matter of free trade; as the authors observe, “left-behind people live in left-behind places,” which explains why regional poverty descended on Appalachia when so many manufacturing jobs left for China in the age of globalism, leaving behind not just left-behind people but also people ripe for exploitation by nationalist politicians. The authors add, interestingly, that the same thing occurred in parts of Germany, Spain, and Norway that fell victim to the “China shock.” In what they call a “slightly technical aside,” they build a case for addressing trade issues not with trade wars but with consumption taxes: “It makes no sense to ask agricultural workers to lose their jobs just so steelworkers can keep theirs, which is what tariffs accomplish.” Policymakers might want to consider such counsel, especially when it is coupled with the observation that free trade benefits workers in poor countries but punishes workers in rich ones.

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

Pub Date: Nov. 12, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-61039-950-0

Page Count: 432

Publisher: PublicAffairs

Review Posted Online: Aug. 28, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2019

Next book

HOW ELITES ATE THE SOCIAL JUSTICE MOVEMENT

Deliberately provocative, with much for left-inclined activists to ponder.

A wide-ranging critique of leftist politics as not being left enough.

Continuing his examination of progressive reform movements begun with The Cult of Smart, Marxist analyst deBoer takes on a left wing that, like all political movements, is subject to “the inertia of established systems.” The great moment for the left, he suggests, ought to have been the summer of 2020, when the murder of George Floyd and the accumulated crimes of Donald Trump should have led to more than a minor upheaval. In Minneapolis, he writes, first came the call from the city council to abolish the police, then make reforms, then cut the budget; the grace note was “an increase in funding to the very department it had recently set about to dissolve.” What happened? The author answers with the observation that it is largely those who can afford it who populate the ranks of the progressive movement, and they find other things to do after a while, even as those who stand to benefit most from progressive reform “lack the cultural capital and economic stability to have a presence in our national media and politics.” The resulting “elite capture” explains why the Democratic Party is so ineffectual in truly representing minority and working-class constituents. Dispirited, deBoer writes, “no great American revolution is coming in the early twenty-first century.” Accommodation to gradualism was once counted heresy among doctrinaire Marxists, but deBoer holds that it’s likely the only truly available path toward even small-scale gains. Meanwhile, he scourges nonprofits for diluting the tax base. It would be better, he argues, to tax those who can afford it rather than allowing deductible donations and “reducing the availability of public funds for public uses.” Usefully, the author also argues that identity politics centering on difference will never build a left movement, which instead must find common cause against conservatism and fascism.

Deliberately provocative, with much for left-inclined activists to ponder.

Pub Date: Sept. 5, 2023

ISBN: 9781668016015

Page Count: 256

Publisher: Simon & Schuster

Review Posted Online: June 28, 2023

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2023

Close Quickview