The many benefits of land-use controls for cities and their residents.
Bronin, former chair of the Hartford, Connecticut, Planning and Zoning Commission and professor of law and city and regional planning at Cornell University, maintains that livable, prosperous, and sustainable cities require a sensitive, flexible application of zoning regulations. To make her case, and among numerous other examples, she tells of how zoning revitalized the Remington neighborhood in Baltimore by legalizing nonresidential uses, supported historic preservation in Galveston, nurtured urban farming in Boston, and manages Las Vegas’ unique signage. She also writes of instances when zoning has been problematic—e.g., stifling affordable, multifamily housing in West University Place, Texas, and squandering water resources in Scottsdale, Arizona. Although Bronin acknowledges that “zoning too often intrudes and imposes on deeply personal choices,” she believes that with “sensible reforms” it can realize its potential as “a tool that can be used creatively, imaginatively, and carefully to build community in an ethical and intentional way.” The author omits one important caveat: zoning does not initiate or execute development. If investment is absent and disinvestment has overwhelmed residents and property owners—cases she discusses—zoning loses its relevancy. Still, though it may not be “the key to our cities,” as she claims, it is hard to imagine a regulatory technology more critical for well-functioning and livable urban areas. Even Houston, known for its lack of a zoning ordinance, employs regulatory devices via other means. Bronin brings to life the impact of zoning on people and places and makes a convincing case for its importance.
An ardent and articulate argument for expansive regulation of urban development.