Hair-raising, instructive, and irresistible reading.
Gripping accounts of the six biggest nuclear disasters.
In his latest authoritative history, Plokhy, professor of Ukrainian history at Harvard, spreads the blame widely. Readers will be surprised to learn that, for a decade after Hiroshima, governments proclaimed that nuclear radiation was inconsequential. This changed in 1954 after America’s “Castle Bravo” test, in which an early nuclear weapon turned out to be unexpectedly powerful. The explosion dumped radioactive fallout over observers and affected islands almost 100 miles away. Government efforts could not completely reassure the public, and the anti-nuclear movement was born. The most famous American nuclear accident was also the least harmful. In 1979, a cooling failure at Pennsylvania’s Three Mile Island reactor produced a partial meltdown and some release of radiation. No employee was badly exposed, and studies showed no increase in cancer rates. However, the initial confusion and media coverage “delivered a major blow to the nuclear industry.” As Plokhy shows, the plutonium factory in Hanford, Washington, remains America’s largest environmental cleanup project, but the Soviet counterpart in the Urals is worse: The immense 1957 explosion of a neglected waste tank produced damage and disease comparable to Chernobyl. The explosions at Chernobyl in 1986 released at least 1 million times more radiation than those at Three Mile Island, killed thousands, and poisoned an immense area. Those responsible had ignored safety rules, and a proper containment building, long required in the West, would have confined the explosions. When the 2011 tsunami struck, Japan’s Fukushima reactors escaped harm, but waves knocked out the cooling system. Explosions released perhaps 10% of Chernobyl’s radiation levels and forced far fewer evacuations, but few experts take comfort in that. Plokhy concludes that these accidents produced only a temporary glitch in the spread of nuclear power, which can never be accident-free, and few outside the industry consider it a safe option for the future. Shelve this excellent account next to James Mahaffey’s Atomic Accidents and Kate Brown’s Plutopia.
Hair-raising, instructive, and irresistible reading.Pub Date: May 17, 2022
ISBN: 978-1-324-02104-9
Page Count: 368
Publisher: Norton
Review Posted Online: March 10, 2022
Kirkus Reviews Issue: April 1, 2022
The value of this book is the context it provides, in a style aimed at a concerned citizenry rather than fellow academics,...
A provocative analysis of the parallels between Donald Trump’s ascent and the fall of other democracies.
Following the last presidential election, Levitsky (Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America, 2003, etc.) and Ziblatt (Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy, 2017, etc.), both professors of government at Harvard, wrote an op-ed column titled, “Is Donald Trump a Threat to Democracy?” The answer here is a resounding yes, though, as in that column, the authors underscore their belief that the crisis extends well beyond the power won by an outsider whom they consider a demagogue and a liar. “Donald Trump may have accelerated the process, but he didn’t cause it,” they write of the politics-as-warfare mentality. “The weakening of our democratic norms is rooted in extreme partisan polarization—one that extends beyond policy differences into an existential conflict over race and culture.” The authors fault the Republican establishment for failing to stand up to Trump, even if that meant electing his opponent, and they seem almost wistfully nostalgic for the days when power brokers in smoke-filled rooms kept candidacies restricted to a club whose members knew how to play by the rules. Those supporting the candidacy of Bernie Sanders might take as much issue with their prescriptions as Trump followers will. However, the comparisons they draw to how democratic populism paved the way toward tyranny in Peru, Venezuela, Chile, and elsewhere are chilling. Among the warning signs they highlight are the Republican Senate’s refusal to consider Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee as well as Trump’s demonization of political opponents, minorities, and the media. As disturbing as they find the dismantling of Democratic safeguards, Levitsky and Ziblatt suggest that “a broad opposition coalition would have important benefits,” though such a coalition would strike some as a move to the center, a return to politics as usual, and even a pragmatic betrayal of principles.
The value of this book is the context it provides, in a style aimed at a concerned citizenry rather than fellow academics, rather than in the consensus it is not likely to build.Pub Date: Jan. 16, 2018
ISBN: 978-1-5247-6293-3
Page Count: 320
Publisher: Crown
Review Posted Online: Nov. 12, 2017
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Dec. 1, 2017
BOOK REVIEW
The Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist (1900–45) collected his work from WWII in two bestselling volumes, this second published in 1944, a year before Pyle was killed by a sniper’s bullet on Okinawa. In his fine introduction to this new edition, G. Kurt Piehler (History/Univ. of Tennessee at Knoxville) celebrates Pyle’s “dense, descriptive style” and his unusual feel for the quotidian GI experience—a personal and human side to war left out of reporting on generals and their strategies. Though Piehler’s reminder about wartime censorship seems beside the point, his biographical context—Pyle was escaping a troubled marriage—is valuable. Kirkus, at the time, noted the hoopla over Pyle (Pulitzer, hugely popular syndicated column, BOMC hype) and decided it was all worth it: “the book doesn’t let the reader down.” Pyle, of course, captures “the human qualities” of men in combat, but he also provides “an extraordinary sense of the scope of the European war fronts, the variety of services involved, the men and their officers.” Despite Piehler’s current argument that Pyle ignored much of the war (particularly the seamier stuff), Kirkus in 1944 marveled at how much he was able to cover. Back then, we thought, “here’s a book that needs no selling.” Nowadays, a firm push might be needed to renew interest in this classic of modern journalism.
Pub Date: April 26, 2001
ISBN: 0-8032-8768-2
Page Count: 513
Publisher: Univ. of Nebraska
Review Posted Online: May 19, 2010
Kirkus Reviews Issue: June 15, 2001
© Copyright 2025 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
