A highly readable series installment that weaves real-world history into a deft, dynamic historical thriller.
In this suspenseful mix of fact and fiction, a disillusioned agent for the Bureau of Investigation journeys to post–World War I France and Germany to search for the remains of Theodore Roosevelt’s war-hero son.
In his provocative, politically charged 2011 thriller, Devil’s Den, set in 1923, Ashby (Time Fall, 2013, etc.) introduced Seth Armitage, an agent assigned to find a killer targeting elderly veterans of the Civil War. By the end of that skillful merging of fiction and American history, a bitter Armitage resigned and joined his father’s Virginia law practice. Now, two years later, he’s been called to Washington, D.C., by new Bureau director J. Edgar Hoover to rejoin the fold and solve a case involving Armitage’s distant relatives the Roosevelts. In real life, the remains of Theodore Roosevelt’s WWI–pilot son, Quentin, were buried with honors in France and exhumed after T.R.’s death for transport to the United States. Ashby, a former senior U.S. Commerce Department official and counterterrorism consultant to the U.S. State Department, uses that exhumation as a springboard for a juicy work featuring conspiracy and corruption in high places. The body in Quentin’s grave, it turns out, is someone else’s, and Armitage’s job is to find out what happened to the young war hero. Haunted by his own memories of the battlefield, Armitage travels to France and then to Germany, shadowed by a sadistic killer who’s been hired to keep the truth from coming out. Another complication: a beautiful agent for the French intelligence service with her own lethal agenda. Ashby supplies impressively researched settings as he describes his complex hero, Hoover’s dark, power-grabbing machinations, the killer’s secret mission of horrific revenge, and the terrible realities of the trenches. He also touches on the rise of Adolf Hitler as a key element of the story. The result is a riveting work of political intrigue, layered with resonances of the past and present.
A highly readable series installment that weaves real-world history into a deft, dynamic historical thriller.Pub Date: N/A
ISBN: N/A
Page Count: -
Publisher: Author Planet Press
Review Posted Online: Nov. 19, 2016
Review Program: Kirkus Indie
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.
Are we not men? We are—well, ask Bigfoot, as Brooks does in this delightful yarn, following on his bestseller World War Z(2006).
A zombie apocalypse is one thing. A volcanic eruption is quite another, for, as the journalist who does a framing voice-over narration for Brooks’ latest puts it, when Mount Rainier popped its cork, “it was the psychological aspect, the hyperbole-fueled hysteria that had ended up killing the most people.” Maybe, but the sasquatches whom the volcano displaced contributed to the statistics, too, if only out of self-defense. Brooks places the epicenter of the Bigfoot war in a high-tech hideaway populated by the kind of people you might find in a Jurassic Park franchise: the schmo who doesn’t know how to do much of anything but tries anyway, the well-intentioned bleeding heart, the know-it-all intellectual who turns out to know the wrong things, the immigrant with a tough backstory and an instinct for survival. Indeed, the novel does double duty as a survival manual, packed full of good advice—for instance, try not to get wounded, for “injury turns you from a giver to a taker. Taking up our resources, our time to care for you.” Brooks presents a case for making room for Bigfoot in the world while peppering his narrative with timely social criticism about bad behavior on the human side of the conflict: The explosion of Rainier might have been better forecast had the president not slashed the budget of the U.S. Geological Survey, leading to “immediate suspension of the National Volcano Early Warning System,” and there’s always someone around looking to monetize the natural disaster and the sasquatch-y onslaught that follows. Brooks is a pro at building suspense even if it plays out in some rather spectacularly yucky episodes, one involving a short spear that takes its name from “the sucking sound of pulling it out of the dead man’s heart and lungs.” Grossness aside, it puts you right there on the scene.
A tasty, if not always tasteful, tale of supernatural mayhem that fans of King and Crichton alike will enjoy.Pub Date: June 16, 2020
ISBN: 978-1-9848-2678-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Del Rey/Ballantine
Review Posted Online: Feb. 9, 2020
Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1, 2020
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK TO SCREEN
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.
A woman accused of shooting her husband six times in the face refuses to speak.
"Alicia Berenson was thirty-three years old when she killed her husband. They had been married for seven years. They were both artists—Alicia was a painter, and Gabriel was a well-known fashion photographer." Michaelides' debut is narrated in the voice of psychotherapist Theo Faber, who applies for a job at the institution where Alicia is incarcerated because he's fascinated with her case and believes he will be able to get her to talk. The narration of the increasingly unrealistic events that follow is interwoven with excerpts from Alicia's diary. Ah, yes, the old interwoven diary trick. When you read Alicia's diary you'll conclude the woman could well have been a novelist instead of a painter because it contains page after page of detailed dialogue, scenes, and conversations quite unlike those in any journal you've ever seen. " 'What's the matter?' 'I can't talk about it on the phone, I need to see you.' 'It's just—I'm not sure I can make it up to Cambridge at the minute.' 'I'll come to you. This afternoon. Okay?' Something in Paul's voice made me agree without thinking about it. He sounded desperate. 'Okay. Are you sure you can't tell me about it now?' 'I'll see you later.' Paul hung up." Wouldn't all this appear in a diary as "Paul wouldn't tell me what was wrong"? An even more improbable entry is the one that pins the tail on the killer. While much of the book is clumsy, contrived, and silly, it is while reading passages of the diary that one may actually find oneself laughing out loud.
Amateurish, with a twist savvy readers will see coming from a mile away.Pub Date: Feb. 5, 2019
ISBN: 978-1-250-30169-7
Page Count: 304
Publisher: Celadon Books
Review Posted Online: Nov. 3, 2018
Kirkus Reviews Issue: Nov. 15, 2018
BOOK REVIEW
BOOK REVIEW
© Copyright 2024 Kirkus Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Follow
Popular in this Genre
We can’t wait for you to join Kirkus!
It’s free and takes less than 10 seconds!
Already have an account? Log in.
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
Welcome Back!
OR
Sign in with GoogleTrouble signing in? Retrieve credentials.
