Next book

LANDING THE PARIS CLIMATE AGREEMENT

HOW IT HAPPENED, WHY IT MATTERS, AND WHAT COMES NEXT

A crash course in the intricacies of multinational climate change policy.

The United States’ chief negotiator chronicles the intricate negotiations leading to the landmark 2015 accord.

Stern dubs the Paris climate agreement an action framework that “immediately changed the game on climate change.” He spells out in great detail the extent to which the success of a multilateral agreement involving 195 nations hinged on seemingly endless talk and innumerable meetings. Beginning with the 2009 Conference of the Parties, he situates the reader in the many discussions required to resolve language concerning such issues as each country’s emission goals, the differential treatment of developed and developing countries, and the degree of transparency to ensure compliance. These negotiations occurred in a multitude of “pull-aside conversations,” restaurant dinners, “impromptu huddles,” side meetings, telephone calls, and intragovernmental consultations. They necessitated lawyers, diplomats, technical analysts, political operatives, policy advisors, and wordsmiths who understood the “constructive ambiguity” of this consensus-based process. In his first-person account, Stern generously praises his staff, political leaders such as President Obama, and the many people who offered cogent advice and artfully chaired critical meetings. On December 12, 2015, COP 21 adopted an agreement Stern characterizes as “ambitious" and "durable,” shifting the paradigm and sending the message that “we were heading for a global low-carbon future.” (That assertion is tempered by the fact that in 2016, President Trump pulled the U.S. out of the agreement.) In his conclusion, Stern proposes that continued progress toward managing climate change depends on “political will and human motivation” and “a broad change in hearts and minds.” Admirable sentiments, but hardly helpful for guiding others through the nuances and legalities of multilateral negotiations. Though this account from the U.S. point of view is valuable, a full assessment of the Paris agreement awaits other perspectives, particularly from developing countries.

A crash course in the intricacies of multinational climate change policy.

Pub Date: Sept. 17, 2024

ISBN: 9780262049146

Page Count: 264

Publisher: MIT Press

Review Posted Online: June 28, 2024

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Aug. 1, 2024

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 17


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Next book

ABUNDANCE

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Awards & Accolades

Likes

  • Readers Vote
  • 17


Our Verdict

  • Our Verdict
  • GET IT


  • New York Times Bestseller

Helping liberals get out of their own way.

Klein, a New York Times columnist, and Thompson, an Atlantic staffer, lean to the left, but they aren’t interrogating the usual suspects. Aware that many conservatives have no interest in their opinions, the authors target their own side’s “pathologies.” Why do red states greenlight the kind of renewable energy projects that often languish in blue states? Why does liberal California have the nation’s most severe homelessness and housing affordability crises? One big reason: Liberal leadership has ensnared itself in a web of well-intentioned yet often onerous “goals, standards, and rules.” This “procedural kludge,” partially shaped by lawyers who pioneered a “democracy by lawsuit” strategy in the 1960s, threatens to stymie key breakthroughs. Consider the anti-pollution laws passed after World War II. In the decades since, homeowners’ groups in liberal locales have cited such statutes in lawsuits meant to stop new affordable housing. Today, these laws “block the clean energy projects” required to tackle climate change. Nuclear energy is “inarguably safer” than the fossil fuel variety, but because Washington doesn’t always “properly weigh risk,” it almost never builds new reactors. Meanwhile, technologies that may cure disease or slash the carbon footprint of cement production benefit from government support, but too often the grant process “rewards caution and punishes outsider thinking.” The authors call this style of governing “everything-bagel liberalism,” so named because of its many government mandates. Instead, they envision “a politics of abundance” that would remake travel, work, and health. This won’t happen without “changing the processes that make building and inventing so hard.” It’s time, then, to scrutinize everything from municipal zoning regulations to the paperwork requirements for scientists getting federal funding. The authors’ debut as a duo is very smart and eminently useful.

Cogent, well-timed ideas for meeting today’s biggest challenges.

Pub Date: March 18, 2025

ISBN: 9781668023488

Page Count: 320

Publisher: Avid Reader Press

Review Posted Online: Jan. 16, 2025

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Feb. 15, 2025

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Close Quickview