CATASTROPHE ETHICS

An informed, careful investigation of the connection between individual choices and large, complex problems.

The problem of how to lead a good, unselfish life is timeless, and Rieder, an academic specializing in bioethics and author of In Pain: A Bioethicist’s Personal Struggle With Opioids, argues that the question has become even more important in the era of climate change, resource depletion, and other world-changing issues. “What is each of us to do?” he asks as he examines various historical approaches. “How do we live a morally decent life when we can’t even get our arms around the problems?” Rieder doesn’t have much time for those who apparently hate to see anyone enjoying themselves, and even less for those who simply deny the challenges. Individual actions—such as reducing resource use and recycling—are important, but every action can generate new dilemmas. For example, does driving a Tesla mean supporting the exploitation of African cobalt miners? Must we calculate our environmental footprint on a daily basis? These kinds of inquiries can entirely consume one’s energies and lead to a dismal, over-audited life. There is an obligation to do the right thing, but you don’t have to be a miserable bully about it. In the closing sections, Rieder proposes some solutions. Do what you can with the resources and skills you have; push for major policy changes where possible; act rather than merely talk; and accept responsibilities small and large. In this multifaceted way, “we rescue our moral agency from the threat of nihilism” and “build a meaningful life.” This approach might disappoint readers who wanted a rousing to-the-barricades ending, but upon reflection, it might be the best advice possible.

With an open mind and a firm grasp of the issues, Rieder brings the question of living a decent life into the modern era.