Next book

OUR WOMEN ON THE GROUND

ESSAYS BY ARAB WOMEN REPORTING FROM THE ARAB WORLD

A timely, engaging work that reveals why the journalist’s profession is so important and so endangered.

A collection of essays by dedicated journalists on the many hurdles they face as women in the field of Middle Eastern newsgathering—edited by Lebanese British journalist Hankir and introduced by CNN chief international anchor Christiane Amanpour.

In many cases, these conflict-zone reporters were inspired to become journalists due to heart-rending stories among their own families and friends. “To become a journalist in some of these places takes a special kind of courage for a woman,” writes Amanpour. “It can mean defying family and community, and it brings unique challenges and entails sacrifices specific to women.” These stories from the field are rare and remarkable, especially because the writers are “twice burdened,” according to Hankir: Not only do they hail from places that mistreat women worse than anywhere in the world; they are also “some of the most repressed reporters in the world.” The book is divided into five sections: “Remembrances,” “Crossfire,” “Resilience,” “Exile,” and “Transition.” In “The Woman Question,” Hannah Allam, covering the war in Iraq for McClatchy Newspapers, writes of the “unspoken understanding that if you delved too deeply into women’s lives, you risked being labeled as soft, or missing the point.” A Lebanese journalist covering the wars in the Middle East for American newspapers, Nada Bakri became deeply disenchanted with the profession after the death of her husband and son’s father, New York Times correspondent Anthony Shadid, in Syria in 2012. Egyptian journalist Lina Attalah (“On a Belated Encounter With Gender”) recalls the 2011 Arab Spring activism in terms of responding to her father’s conflicted feelings about her being a journalist. Egyptian photojournalist Eman Helal writes of being routinely restricted from “hard news” assignments and then finding her story in the harassment of women protesters in Tahrir Square in Cairo in 2011. Others, such as photographer Amira Al-Sharif, who was born in Saudi Arabia but raised in Yemen, write that being women allowed them to cover stories that men could not.

A timely, engaging work that reveals why the journalist’s profession is so important and so endangered.

Pub Date: Aug. 6, 2019

ISBN: 978-0-14-313341-4

Page Count: 304

Publisher: Penguin

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: June 15, 2019

Next book

A PEOPLE'S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES

For Howard Zinn, long-time civil rights and anti-war activist, history and ideology have a lot in common. Since he thinks that everything is in someone's interest, the historian—Zinn posits—has to figure out whose interests he or she is defining/defending/reconstructing (hence one of his previous books, The Politics of History). Zinn has no doubts about where he stands in this "people's history": "it is a history disrespectful of governments and respectful of people's movements of resistance." So what we get here, instead of the usual survey of wars, presidents, and institutions, is a survey of the usual rebellions, strikes, and protest movements. Zinn starts out by depicting the arrival of Columbus in North America from the standpoint of the Indians (which amounts to their standpoint as constructed from the observations of the Europeans); and, after easily establishing the cultural disharmony that ensued, he goes on to the importation of slaves into the colonies. Add the laborers and indentured servants that followed, plus women and later immigrants, and you have Zinn's amorphous constituency. To hear Zinn tell it, all anyone did in America at any time was to oppress or be oppressed; and so he obscures as much as his hated mainstream historical foes do—only in Zinn's case there is that absurd presumption that virtually everything that came to pass was the work of ruling-class planning: this amounts to one great indictment for conspiracy. Despite surface similarities, this is not a social history, since we get no sense of the fabric of life. Instead of negating the one-sided histories he detests, Zinn has merely reversed the image; the distortion remains.

Pub Date: Jan. 1, 1979

ISBN: 0061965588

Page Count: 772

Publisher: Harper & Row

Review Posted Online: May 26, 2012

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Jan. 1, 1979

Next book

GOOD ECONOMICS FOR HARD TIMES

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

“Quality of life means more than just consumption”: Two MIT economists urge that a smarter, more politically aware economics be brought to bear on social issues.

It’s no secret, write Banerjee and Duflo (co-authors: Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way To Fight Global Poverty, 2011), that “we seem to have fallen on hard times.” Immigration, trade, inequality, and taxation problems present themselves daily, and they seem to be intractable. Economics can be put to use in figuring out these big-issue questions. Data can be adduced, for example, to answer the question of whether immigration tends to suppress wages. The answer: “There is no evidence low-skilled migration to rich countries drives wage and employment down for the natives.” In fact, it opens up opportunities for those natives by freeing them to look for better work. The problem becomes thornier when it comes to the matter of free trade; as the authors observe, “left-behind people live in left-behind places,” which explains why regional poverty descended on Appalachia when so many manufacturing jobs left for China in the age of globalism, leaving behind not just left-behind people but also people ripe for exploitation by nationalist politicians. The authors add, interestingly, that the same thing occurred in parts of Germany, Spain, and Norway that fell victim to the “China shock.” In what they call a “slightly technical aside,” they build a case for addressing trade issues not with trade wars but with consumption taxes: “It makes no sense to ask agricultural workers to lose their jobs just so steelworkers can keep theirs, which is what tariffs accomplish.” Policymakers might want to consider such counsel, especially when it is coupled with the observation that free trade benefits workers in poor countries but punishes workers in rich ones.

Occasionally wonky but overall a good case for how the dismal science can make the world less—well, dismal.

Pub Date: Nov. 12, 2019

ISBN: 978-1-61039-950-0

Page Count: 432

Publisher: PublicAffairs

Review Posted Online: Aug. 28, 2019

Kirkus Reviews Issue: Sept. 15, 2019

Close Quickview